Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-10-12 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia 5 II is much better than the Google Pixel 3a, having an 87.2 score against 78.8. Although Sony Xperia 5 II is just a bit heavier than Google Pixel 3a, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. The Sony Xperia 5 II counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Sony Xperia 5 II also has more RAM.
Sony Xperia 5 II counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little larger display, a quite greater display density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2520px. The Xperia 5 II features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal storage.
The Sony Xperia 5 II features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much larger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and a larger aperture for better low light captures and videos.
The Xperia 5 II has greater battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Xperia 5 II is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Xperia 5 II, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.