Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 94.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-01-26 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 2500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 1644 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 643 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 22.92 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia PRO is better than the Google Pixel 3a, having a 94.3 score against 78.8. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Sony Xperia PRO has older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. The Sony Xperia PRO body is newer, but notably thicker and incredibly heavier than Google Pixel 3a.
The Xperia PRO features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a way higher 1644 x 3840px resolution, more pixels per screen inch and a larger display. The Xperia PRO has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 512 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Sony Xperia PRO has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Sony Xperia PRO also has more RAM. Xperia PRO features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Xperia PRO has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
Although Xperia PRO is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.