Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, having a 78.8 score against 76.1. Google Pixel 3a is an older cellphone than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, but Google made it noticeably lighter and thinner anyway. These devices use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features.
TCL 20 Pro 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has more RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a features a little sharper display than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2220px resolution, it also counts with a little better pixel count in each inch in the screen.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a lot more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1 TB. TCL 20 Pro 5G has a superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.