Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-09-26 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi 14T Pro is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a overall score of 84.5 against 78.8. Xiaomi 14T Pro's body is newer than the Google Pixel 3a's, although it is just a bit thicker and incredibly heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Xiaomi 14T Pro has a newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a way better display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a bigger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a little higher pixel amount in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a way higher video definition, a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.