Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blasting black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has an overall score of 90.1, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a newer device than the Google Pixel 3a, although it's a lot heavier and notably thicker.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a larger display and a just a little better pixels count in each display inch. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a back facing camera with much more megapixels, better video frame rates and a way larger sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.