Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a, having an 82.7 score against 78.8. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also a a little thicker and a lot heavier cellphone.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little lower pixels quantity per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has better video frame rates, a much larger sensor capturing way better quality videos and pictures and a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.