Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a score of 83.8 against 78.8. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's construction has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3a, but it is way heavier. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3a features a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch and a quite better 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution. The Google Pixel 3a and the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s count with quite similar cameras, and although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a lesser MP back facing camera and a lower video resolution, they both have the same sensor size and a F1.8 camera aperture.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.