Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-11-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, having an 83.8 score against 78.8. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's body is just a bit thicker and a lot heavier than the Google Pixel 3a. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a quite worse pixel count in each inch of display, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, a back camera with a 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, a 0.39 inches camera sensor and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has faster 60 fps video frame rate.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.