Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-07-19 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a score of 84.3, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a more recent 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11, so it provides the user some nice extra features and performance improvements. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4's construction is way newer and a lot thinner, but also extremely heavier than Google Pixel 3a.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a way better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little bit worse pixels count in each screen inch, it also counts with a much better 2224 x 2488 pixels resolution and a way larger display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture, a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a lot better video resolution. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.