Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-11-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, getting an 83.7 score against 78.8. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a noticeably heavier and thicker phone than Google Pixel 3a. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5260mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 also has a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and video, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and a way better resolution camera in the back.
Although Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.