Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is better than Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the previous 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro's design is newer, but extremely heavier and a little bit thicker than the Google Pixel 3a.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger display.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro takes way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.