Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's 78.7 overall score. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 3a is older than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, it's construction is just a little thinner and lighter. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a little sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.