Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-03-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, with a overall score of 83.4 against 78.8. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro's design is newer, but somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier than the Google Pixel 3a. Both devices in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater display density.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a much better resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.