Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a score of 82.4, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 score. Both devices we are comparing here have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a much heavier phone than Google Pixel 3a, but both of them have the same thickness.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little bit worse pixels amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.