Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's 78.2 general score. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. The Google Pixel 3a design is just a little thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it was released many years before.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Google Pixel 3a and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S count with very similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 3a shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a camera in the back with way less megapixels, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.