Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a score of 86.1, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's general score of 78.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a much heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone than Google Pixel 3a. These devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide the user the same operating system features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little better number of pixels per inch of display, a bigger screen and a lot better resolution of 2080 x 2400px. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 72 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.