Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, having a score of 78.8 against 77.1. Both phones we compare here have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). The Google Pixel 3a is a much lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, but they have the same thickness. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a lot better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little bit more pixels per screen inch, a lot higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 108 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.