Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-11-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, with a 78.8 score against 75.7. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12 version. The Google Pixel 3a is a notably older and a bit thicker device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, but Google could make it incredibly lighter anyway.
The Google Pixel 3a features a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a larger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality and a much better 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.