Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-01-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | -- |
| Black, Purple and White | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, getting a score of 78.8 against 77.1. These devices use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a has 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. Google Pixel 3a has a much better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a camera with much more mega pixels, a much larger sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.