Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-01-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a general score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is a much heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 3a, but both are equally thin. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels in each inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 256 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution camera and better video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.