Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has an overall score of 80.2, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 general score. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but the ZTE Axon 10 Pro has the previous 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. ZTE Axon 10 Pro's construction is heavier but just a bit thinner than Google Pixel 3a, and both were released only 0 months apart.
The Google Pixel 3a has a little more vivid screen than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a quite better screen density. The ZTE Axon 10 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has greater battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. ZTE Axon 10 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Although ZTE Axon 10 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you want to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3a, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.