Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Ochre and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a general score of 78.8 against 76.6. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version while ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. Google Pixel 3a's construction is somewhat lighter than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro, although it's a bit thicker and was released about 9 months before.
The Google Pixel 3a features a little bit better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has more RAM memory.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 2560x1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a lot more MP camera, a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.