Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has an overall score of 93.3, which is much better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's overall score of 82.9. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's construction is newer and just a little bit thinner, but just a little heavier than the Google Pixel 4 XL. IPhone 13 Pro has a superior hardware performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have a 6 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a quite lower number of pixels per screen inch, a bit worse 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen. The iPhone 13 Pro shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low-light environments.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4 XL features superior battery lifetime than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4 XL. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 4 XL, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.