Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, with a global score of 93.2 against 82.9. Even though the iPhone 13 Pro Max is somewhat heavier than Google Pixel 4 XL, it's a little thinner and also newer. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a better performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Google Pixel 4 XL and the iPhone 13 Pro Max feature extremely similar screens, because although the iPhone 13 Pro Max has a little bit lower display pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1284 x 2778, it also counts with a bit larger screen. The iPhone 13 Pro Max shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lower video definition and a lesser megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal storage capacity. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4352mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4 XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.