Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 score. The iPhone X body is a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Google Pixel 4 XL, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. The Apple iPhone X has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a way worse 1125 x 2436px resolution, a little lower pixels density and a quite smaller display.
The iPhone X features a much greater memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory. IPhone X has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 36 percent greater battery size. The iPhone X shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a back facing camera with a worse 12 mega pixels resolution, a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light images, a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality images and a worse video quality.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 4 XL. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.