Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than Apple iPhone XR, having an 82.9 score against 82. Google Pixel 4 XL is a newer phone, and it's also a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Apple iPhone XR. The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better screen than Apple iPhone XR, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a much higher pixel density and a little larger display.
The Apple iPhone XR counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has less and slower cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Google Pixel 4 XL and iPhone XR both feature incredibly similar storage capacity for games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Apple iPhone XR features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a worse (4K) video quality, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video and a camera in the back with a lower 12 MP resolution, they both have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features better battery life than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 2942mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 4 XL is also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.