Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Google Nexus 6's global score of 81.1. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is extremely newer and a lot thinner, but just a bit heavier than Google Nexus 6. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better processing unit than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Google Nexus 6 counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a little worse 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, a little bit smaller screen and a little lower pixel quantity in each inch in the screen. Google Nexus 6's storage to store more games and applications is just as good as the Google Pixel 4 XL one, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 15% bigger battery size. Google Pixel 4 XL shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a lower 12.2 MP resolution camera in the back and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better captures and videos in low light environments.
The Google Pixel 4 XL is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.