Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, with an 82.9 score against 82.5. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a a lot newer phone than Google Pixel 2 XL, although it's just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a little bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5% bigger battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 XL's camera is very similar to Google Pixel 4 XL's camera, and although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a tinier aperture and a tinier sensor capturing worse quality photos and videos, they both have a 12.2 MP camera, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 2 XL, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.