Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3's score of 80. Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is newer, but just a little bit thicker and incredibly heavier than Google Pixel 3. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a little bit better pixels amount in each inch in the screen, a quite larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution. Google Pixel 4 XL and Google Pixel 3 count with very similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, they have equal internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a camera that is just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 4 XL, and although the Google Pixel 3 has a smaller aperture, they both have a same size camera sensor, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.