Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than Honor 50 Pro's overall score of 77. Even though the Google Pixel 4 XL is better than the Honor 50 Pro, it must be told that it's also an older, just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better looking screen than Honor 50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel number per inch in the display and a bit higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution.
Honor 50 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 4 XL has just a little better hardware performance than Honor 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Honor 50 Pro has a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3700mAh. Honor 50 Pro has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much higher 108 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.