Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a global score of 82.9, which is a bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's global score of 82.7. Google Pixel 4 XL's body is just a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier than the LG G8X ThinQ, and they were only released 0 months apart. Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher pixels density.
The Google Pixel 4 XL and the LG G8X ThinQ both have extremely similar processing units, they have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a camera with a lower resolution, a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G8X ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG G8X ThinQ, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.