Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than the LG K52, getting an 82.9 score against 76. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is a little bit thinner than LG K52, although it is just a little bit heavier and was released around 13 months before. Google Pixel 4 XL features a way better display than LG K52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher screen density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040.
LG K52 features a much better storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG K52 also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little better hardware performance than LG K52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG K52 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG K52 also counts with a much larger sensor and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
LG K52 has a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.