Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is a little bit better than the LG K62's global score of 78.2. Google Pixel 4 XL's construction is just a bit thinner than the LG K62, but it's a bit heavier and was released a little bit more than a year before. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with an incredibly better display than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a way greater pixel count per display inch.
LG K62 has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit faster processing unit than LG K62, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG K62 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3700mAh. LG K62 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the LG K62 also counts with a much larger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.