Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 general score. The LG K92 body is newer than Google Pixel 4 XL's, but it is just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better screen than LG K92, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better processing power than LG K92. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. LG K92 features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG K92 also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much higher quality pictures and videos and a camera with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution.
The LG K92 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 features a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8% larger battery capacity.
LG K92 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.