Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than LG Q70, getting a score of 82.9 against 77.9. Google Pixel 4 XL is a a little bit lighter cellphone than LG Q70, but both of them are 0.32inches thick. The Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better looking display than LG Q70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The LG Q70 counts with a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG Q70 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better processor than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG Q70 features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in low light situations and a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG Q70 also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher 32 mega pixels resolution.
LG Q70 features just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has an 8 percent bigger battery size.
The Google Pixel 4 XL costs more money than LG Q70, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.