Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than the LG V10, with a general score of 82.9 against 78.6. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a little heavier than the LG V10, it's just a little bit thinner and also noticeably newer. The LG V10 features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440, a bit smaller screen and a little inferior number of pixels per inch of display.
LG V10 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V10 also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a faster CPU than LG V10, because it has a higher number of cores and more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features improved battery duration than LG V10, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity. The LG V10 has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same video definition, the LG V10 also counts with higher 120 frames per second video frame rate and a lot better 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V10. If you want to save some money, you can buy the LG V10, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.