Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is slightly better than LG V35 ThinQ's global score of 81.3. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a newer device than LG V35 ThinQ, but it is heavier and a little thicker. LG V35 ThinQ features a display that's very similar to the display in Google Pixel 4 XL, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a little smaller screen and a little worse 1440 x 2880px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount per inch in the display.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a CPU that's just as good as the Google Pixel 4 XL one, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 6 GB of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality pictures and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photos and a camera with way more MP.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the LG V35 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.