Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ, having an 82.9 score against 81.2. The Google Pixel 4 XL body is newer than the LG V40 ThinQ's, although it is just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The LG V40 ThinQ and Google Pixel 4 XL both count with very similar processors, both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a display that's just as good as the display in Google Pixel 4 XL, although the LG V40 ThinQ also has a bit larger screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a just a little more pixels per screen inch. LG V40 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 12 percent larger battery capacity. The LG V40 ThinQ has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, a tinier camera sensor offering a lower image quality and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V40 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.