Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL's global score of 82.9. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the LG V60 ThinQ construction is heavier and a little bit thicker than the Google Pixel 4 XL. The LG V60 ThinQ's processing unit is very similar to Google Pixel 4 XL's processor, and although the LG V60 ThinQ has 2 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a slightly better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way better video quality and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels. The LG V60 ThinQ has improved battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.