Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a little bit better than Google Pixel 4 XL, getting an 87.1 score against 82.9. LG Velvet is a just a little bit thinner and a little lighter cellphone than Google Pixel 4 XL, even though both were only released 7 months apart. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more vivid screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better CPU than LG Velvet. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. LG Velvet counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage.
LG Velvet shoots better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG Velvet also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
LG Velvet counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG Velvet is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.