Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, having a score of 91.2 against 82.9. LG Wing's construction is newer, but much thicker and notably heavier than the Google Pixel 4 XL. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little faster CPU than LG Wing, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a greater pixels quantity per inch in the screen. The LG Wing features a superior memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
LG Wing takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG Wing also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, faster 60 fps video frame rates and a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
LG Wing features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4 XL. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.