Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having an 82.9 score against 80.9. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, even though it was released 3 years before. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a lot lower display density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster). The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger sensor and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.