Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting a global score of 82.9 against 77. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Google Pixel 4 XL is a incredibly older, heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo features a bit better display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel number per inch in the display and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display. Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a way better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with greater battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.