Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, with a global score of 83.4 against 82.9. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a notably newer phone than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it is just a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 4 XL and Motorola Edge 40 Pro both feature similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a way lower pixel number per inch of display and a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a greater camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.