Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's general score of 81.9. Google Pixel 4 XL's body has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it is somewhat heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a sharper display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a little bit worse pixel density and a quite lower 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.