Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, having a score of 86.3 against 82.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a a little bit lighter device than Google Pixel 4 XL, but both of them are 0.32inches thick. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a bit better display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way worse pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 22% bigger battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.