Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than the Moto G Power, with a global score of 82.9 against 76.1. Even when Google Pixel 4 XL and the Moto G Power were released with only a couple of months difference, Google Pixel 4 XL is thinner and a little lighter. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little sharper screen than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040.
Google Pixel 4 XL has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola Moto G Power also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G Power has better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rates and a same size aperture, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto G Power. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Moto G Power, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.