Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than Moto G Stylus (2021), having a overall score of 82.9 against 79.3. The Google Pixel 4 XL is an older phone than the Moto G Stylus (2021), but it's a little bit thinner and just a little lighter anyway. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit superior processor than Moto G Stylus (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM memory. The Moto G Stylus (2021) has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Stylus (2021). If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto G Stylus (2021), and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.