Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G has a global score of 86.2, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL's score of 82.9. The Moto G200 5G construction is incredibly newer than Google Pixel 4 XL's, although it is a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Moto G200 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little sharper screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a better pixel density. Moto G200 5G has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a much higher 108 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Moto G200 5G counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Moto G200 5G counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.