Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than Moto Z Force, having a global score of 82.9 against 75.8. The Google Pixel 4 XL construction is incredibly newer, but thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z Force. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a greater pixels quantity in each screen inch, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a slightly better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a bit larger display.
Moto Z Force counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Moto Z Force shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto Z Force also counts with a much better 21 megapixels resolution back camera.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 6 percent larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, else you can save some money and get the Moto Z Force, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.